Why Open Source No-code Platforms Should Not Be Your Choice

Using an open-source no-code platform has its advantages. They’re free to use, easily customizable, and have a lot of people investing efforts into improving the source code. But they also with some limitations.

 When you’re looking to choose a no-code platform for your business, you have the option of choosing between an open-source tool and a closed-source or proprietary alternative. Going for the open-source option can pose many challenges. Let's examine why open-source no-code platforms should not be your choice and why you should choose proprietary software instead. 

Why open-source no-code platforms should not be your business choice

1. Security

The top concern with open-source no-code platforms is the risk of vulnerabilities. Open-source platforms feature freely-editable sources available for anyone to inspect and modify. The implication is that people with malicious intent can also see this code.

The implication is a heightened risk of the deliberate creation of viruses to infect hardware or software, steal data, or commit fraud. Security breaches of this sort are less likely with proprietary platforms since there are more stringent protocols to keep the platform secure.

2. Integration

Integration problems with no-code platforms can take different forms. Open-source no-code platforms depend on the integration of several third-party components to work optimally. The resulting complexity can be challenging to manage.

But for open-source projects, the opposite of this situation arises. Many open-source platforms do not have the standardized protocols needed to connect with the business tools you're already using. Proprietary software is often designed with integration in mind and can integrate seamlessly with other software products with relative ease.

3. Support:

Reliable support from whatever platform you sign up on is a must-have. This way, you can always contact the vendor if anything goes wrong. With an open-source platform, no one takes responsibility for support. This means if anything goes wrong, there's no one specifically to call for help. Many open-source products have an active community of developers that may offer support when you need it, but this isn't always as robust as what you get from a proprietary tool.

4. Usability

Many open-source platforms prioritize functionality over ease of use. While they may work as intended, they're not very user-friendly and there's no incentive to make the platform easier to navigate for users.

With closed-source platforms, usability is always a priority. The company behind the company includes user-friendly features and an intuitive interface that is simpler for users at all skill levels.

What are the alternatives of open source no-code platforms?

Kissflow is a perfect example of a closed-source no-code platform. It has higher benefits compared to the open-source no-code platform in many areas. As an alternative to an open-source platform, Kissflow is a secure, highly flexible, and highly intuitive platform. This proprietary software solution prioritizes ease of use. But more importantly, it offers 24/7 support to help users troubleshoot issues and navigate the platform seamlessly. 

Since this is not an open-source platform, no one but the vendor can make changes to the code, add features or upgrade it. It offers enterprise-level security and the latest encryption to secure the platform from hacking and other cyber attacks.

Unlike open-source platforms, closed-sourced solutions are built for profit. This provides an incentive for frequent updates and feature upgrades to keep up with industry standards, ensure customer satisfaction and compete effectively with other no-code.